Tools

Asset Continuity ROI Calculator

This is the bottom-of-funnel worksheet: paste the annual drag you already believe in, add a rough implementation envelope, and size team / asset context—then read modeled payback and ROI at 12 and 24 months.

Inputs

Bring forward drag from the other worksheets—then stress-test implementation cost and team / asset scale for a defensible ROI story.

Estimated annual cost of current-state inefficiency ($)

Roll up record bottleneck tax, integration tax, rework, latency, or risk-at-$ from your own models.

Implementation cost — rough ($)

Program fee, migration, change management, and internal time—one envelope.

Team size (FTE touching continuity / records)

Roles that re-type, reconcile, or inherit handoffs—not total company headcount.

Material portfolio / estate value ($) — optional

Improves the modeled gain % when inefficiency is large vs book; leave blank if you prefer not to size assets.

Outputs

Bottom-of-funnel framing: modeled lift, payback, and ROI at 12 vs 24 months with a staged realization curve—not a board guarantee.

Efficiency gain %Steady-state vs current run-rate drag: 45.5%
Payback periodRun-rate savings vs implementation envelope: 8 mo
ROI @ 12 months(50% maturity realization in year 1): −16.1%
ROI @ 24 monthsCumulative benefit with higher year-2 realization: 114.8%

Implied steady-state savings / year: $536,900

Methodology (short)

Gain % rises with FTE intensity and (optionally) inefficiency vs asset scale—capped for realism.
Savings = annual inefficiency × gain %.
ROI uses staged capture: 50% of run-rate savings in the first 12 months, then 78% of run-rate in months 13–24 (vs year-one partial), minus implementation paid upfront.

Build the board version with us

Illustrative model only. Board-ready ROI requires your finance partner, capitalization policy, and program scope—not a website calculator.